Sata plans to impose Luo, a fellow Bisa as Chitimukulu

Ailing dictator Michael Sata plans and is heavily fighting to impose a fellow Bisa as Chief Chitimukulu, the paramount Chief of the Bemba people.

Meanwhile, the Bemba Royal Establishment has rejected  Sata’s decision to degazette Henry Sosala Senior Chief Mwamba of the Bemba-speaking people of Kasama.

Last Thursday, President Sata withdrew recognition of Henry Kanyanta Sosala as senior chief Mwamba of the Bemba-speaking people of Kasama.
But radio Mano in Kasama reports that Bashilubemba (Bemba Chiefs)  had a meeting over the matter on Friday where they rejected Sata’s decision, calling it government interference in traditional affairs.

The Watchdog has been informed that the fight is not just about chief Mwamba but Bemba chiefs have realised that Sata wants to impose a fellow Bisa as Chitimukulu.

Sources in the Bemba Royal Establishment have told the Watchdog that Bembas are due to chose the new Chitimukulu next month since the passing of the last Chiti last year.

‘But Sata wants to impose Bob Luo, Nkandu Luo’s brother who is currently chief Chibesakunda of the Bisa people’, a source explained.

From the time Chitimukulu died, Sata has been busy meddling in the traditional activities. Before the traditional leaders announced the death of theire King as per custom, Sata was writing letters of condolences to the Royal Establishemnt.

Zambia now deeply meddling in Zimbabwe politics - Zim Media
Professor Hansungule says Supreme Court ruling on Tribunal has weakened judiciary

90 Responses to "Sata plans to impose Luo, a fellow Bisa as Chitimukulu"

  1. Maunteni  May 13, 2013 at 22:18

    Mufyonse kusangwamo. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  2. trader  May 13, 2013 at 21:10

    thankyou – we all need this crush course so that we defend this attempted assault on our heritage!

  3. Jane  May 13, 2013 at 12:44

    My advice to my traditional cousins, the Kaonde-Luba (Bemba) is that they should maintain their Sosala as their Chitimukulu. We have Nevers Mumba, GBM, and many more Lubas who should be in position to support their Chiefdom financially. Don’t late a non-Luba to ascend the their throne. The Bisas, as historical Lundas, should stay out of Bemba issues. If Sata wants to withhold Chitimukulu’s allowances, do not bow to him (Sata), because he (Sata) will have no choice but re-recognise Sosala as the Chitimukulu of the Bemba people. Remember, ‘Resist the devil and he will flee from you.’

  4. Uniqueo  May 13, 2013 at 12:33

    @Compos Mentis, it’s a simplistic attitude to be fixated on chiefs as the bedrock of our cultural heritage. As you rightly put it, they are just cheap figure-heads in the new age and unnecessary luxury and high cost to both the national treasury and to individuals who are scared to demystify and eliminate this useless institution. You don’t need a chief to perpetuate your language or positive culture in the middle of Cairo road or Times Square. Chill, Zambia, chill – chiefs are just dinosaurs – not even fit for the recycle bin!

    • Chipukumutwi  May 13, 2013 at 14:45

      Are you mad?

  5. ZONDA  May 13, 2013 at 12:09

    I urge all the bemba chiefs to refuse this.You have the royal establishment which guides you as who should become Chitimukulu. Sata is always causing confusion. He did bring division between Paramount chief Mpezeni and Chief Madzimawe. This president should have no interference in the traditional affairs of the tribes where he does not come from.He has employed all his relatives,put them in strategic positions every where now he wants to dictate the SHILUBEMBAS.

  6. PHIRI  May 13, 2013 at 12:05

    LET THE BEMBAS ALONE IMWE BANA BA NSANYA

  7. chola  May 13, 2013 at 10:12

    The question should be about the lineage of the mother and not where they come from. If the mother of the said is from Ngoshe Mukote, the Matriarch of Bemba Chiefs, then am afraid the claim is valid!

  8. Wawa  May 13, 2013 at 09:42

    kekekekekekeke..its good they are realising now that they are being used..kekekeke

  9. Old Katuba Boys  May 13, 2013 at 08:27

    If this story is true then its the worst thing to happen, because even Chibesakunda’s reign is questionable to be a Bisa Chief, there are Court issues surrounding the Chiefdom.The Bembas have a straight forward succession arrangement which can not be expected to be found in this comfusion.It must be someone fanning trouble who has some vested interest in the whole issue.But what is true is that a Bisa can not be a Chitimukulu that is imposible , though i dont come from that part of the country at least i went to school and learnt history and had an opportunity even to teach about the tribal migrations in Zambia.The politicians must desist fron causing confusion in the tarditional arrangements. The other thing is the since we now have a ministry solely for the Chiefs affairs we neen to have some anthroprogical records be put in place. If we dont have archives to run to we can have this be done again so that we have proper records in place.

  10. DRAY  May 13, 2013 at 07:58

    ONE ZAMBIA ONE NATION WE WANT TO SEE UPND STRONG IN NORTHERN,LUAPULA MUCHINGA AND COPPERBELT PROVINCES.PLEASE HH AND UPND IS NOT FOR SOUTHERN PROVINCE.TWAPAPATA WE SUPPORT THIS YOUNG MAN BUT PLEASE REMOVE THE “TONGA TAG” FROM HIM IT PUTS OTHER TRIBES OFF.

    • Vilifier  May 13, 2013 at 09:28

      The people who put the tonga tag on him should remove it. I have never understood why people cant see the man is supported on merit and his achievements are there for all to see.

      But as usual people with no issues always pull out the tribal card.

      Ask PF, POST AND OTHER USEFUL IDIOTS WHAT THEY TALK ABOUT.

    • The Prophet  May 13, 2013 at 12:09

      It is you (other tribes) that only vote for your fellow tribesmen regardless of whether they can deliver or not. You only see your tribe as being capable of managing the country’s affairs while others cant.Northen, Luapula and other Bemba dominated regions have never given UPND an MP WHY?. As long as one is contesting on a party not led by a BEMBA you dont vote for such a one. Which one Zambia on Nation are you going to Cheat us. Only good at tagging other tribes as being tribal when you are also promoting BEMBA tribalism. If anthing BEMBAs are the most TRIBAL in this country called Zambia when it comes to Politics and Job ooportunities including higher institution enrollemnt. Already most Bembas after seeing that PF is headed for doom in 2016 due to partisan development have started talking about CHIPIMO. What qualities does CHIPIMO posses that he could be said to be better than MILUPI or HH? Its just BEMBA TRIBALISM.

      Kilometer SAMPA even confirmed it in Parliament by stating that unless you have BEMBA genes you could never ever become President in Zambia and The Past Newspaper’s Fred MEMBE could not condemn it but was loudest at putting words into HH’s mouth that he meant or referred to BEMBAs when he was quoted by media houses during a press briefing that “IF YOU THINK YOUR TRIBE IS MORE SUPERIOR THAN OTHERS THEN YOU ARE STUPID” Hypocrite Goat MEMBE.

      As far as SATA and PF are concernced Northwestern and Southern Province are not Zambia just because they dont have MPs there save for one in each province. So when they are going to Livinstone they believe the are driving in a a foreign country from Chilanga until they enter Livingstone Central Constituency.SHAME on them. 2016 is coming will teach them a lesson. Ama Facts Bane. Swallow these facts or vomit, its up to you.

      • Boogie  May 13, 2013 at 13:15

        Point of correction, the bembas have voted for presidents from other regions unlike what has been happening in southern province. For example, Mwanwasa won the elections in bemba land in 2001. In spite of him insulting the bemba speaking people that they were dirty and stinking, he still managed to win some seats in northern province in 2006.On this i am afraid to tell you that you are wrong. The 2008 presidential by elections also showed that R B won in some constituencies in Northern province unlike in Southern province where he did not win even in one constituency. As for tribalism in the work place ; i have had the opportunity to work for a quasi governmental organisation and the situation is exactly opposite of what you are saying. People got fired on suspicion because they were Bemba. However, whenever it was someone from southern province involved, the case would die a natural death despite the overwhelming evidence of misconduct.Tell us about the things that we do not know about.Stop thinking that every one who reads this blog is ignorant and can just accept everything that you post in spite of it being wrong.

  11. DRAY  May 13, 2013 at 07:51

    Insults will not take the country anywhere.Let us contribute positively and constructively.Ba Sata na ba Nkandu Luo bantu abakalamba we respect them and we know that balishiba intambi sha kulubemba.Ishi insele tulemona apa its realy unfortunate because I thought us Zambians are well cultured people.What has gone wrong? Some pipo hate the head of state so much that they dont see any thing good about him.2016 is not far even if we elect HH as president he also human (flesh and blood) he has room to error. Lets not be narrow minded it will take all of us to develop this country. NO TO TRIBLE POLITICS

  12. Mbala Mafia  May 13, 2013 at 07:18

    Please do not include Mambwes and Namwangas we are not tribal like you Bembas. As do enjoy good relations with all tribes

  13. CHILEMBI  May 13, 2013 at 07:06

    All you chaps from luapula and central province call your selves who you are!!are you not ashemed to let your tribes get extict??Ati kunda iam bemba or why dont you call youe selves ushi or lala or tabwa or what ever you are??lo

    • Tech Reporter  May 13, 2013 at 07:36

      Tats makes wonder too..!some groups exist in name only.

  14. Vilifier  May 13, 2013 at 07:04

    This is a confusing fight, bemba, bias, lala, blah blah, you guys are all the same save us from your nonsense.

  15. mwansa mulenga  May 13, 2013 at 06:37

    efyo inkondo ya mitundu ibuuka ififine, ngamwakwata umuntu ushaihsiba nangu chimo ngakateka, uuletichita kwati naishiba kanshi teshibe.Even in modern life anyone who talks alot it means he tapali ifyo eshibe.Ba sata , beonaula ifyo twaiikala fwebene, inkondo yamba ififine ndemwebako mwebantu.

    mwansa

  16. Bemba Economic Empowerment (BEE)  May 13, 2013 at 05:51

    Bembas again are failing to manage even traditional arrangements because of their donchi kubeba (ubufi) mentality.

    • Boogie  May 13, 2013 at 13:18

      Donchi kubeba was coined by Dr Guy Scott. I do not remember a bemba saying that.

  17. Compos Mentis  May 13, 2013 at 03:04

    @ We mubemba nkonko

    Thank you for this info. It’s wonderful. Question: Is all this documented somewhere for posterity?

    Thanks!

  18. Guy man  May 13, 2013 at 02:45

    Out of what u have said, what are you sayng? Lets avoid insults and tribal comments, they dilute our innocence and reasoning: somewhat backward for lack of a better word.

  19. Blago  May 13, 2013 at 00:54

    Actually, its the non-bembas like Bisas, lungus and those from Luapula who have ruined the reputation of the Bemba language.

    Otherwise most real Bembas have good values. Non-bembas especially those from Luapula and the Bisas seem to have an inferiority attitude towards their languages, and have instead adopted Bemba. What a shame!!!!!

    • sinazeze  May 13, 2013 at 06:31

      i second you

    • Zambian  May 13, 2013 at 12:02

      Your are very right. They hind in the name of bemba meanwhile they are not. Some are Tabwas from Kaputa, Lungu/Mambwes from Mpulungu or Mbala, Lalas from Serenje, Bisas from Mpika, Namwangas from Isoka/Nakonde, Lundas from Luapula, Ushis Nchelenge and Ngumbos from Samfya.They are not proud to speak their sweet languages in public but instead speak bemba.Please promot your languages otherwise you offsprinks will only know them by name.

      • Jane  May 13, 2013 at 12:32

        You are all wrong. Even Bembas don’t speak their own language but IciShila. Bembas are Lubas and the closest language for them is Kaonde-Luba.

        Now because all in Luapula and Northern Provinces speak what everyone perceives to be Bemba, all the wrongs perpetuated by all these tribal groupings cast blame on the Bembas. For instance Sata’s mother is Bisa and most of Sata’s appointees are Bisa, but most people think Sata is appointing Bembas only because Bisas speak Icishila (but perceived as Bemba).

        Please, don’t blames Bembas. They are enduring the same persecution the rest of Zambians are.

  20. Blago  May 13, 2013 at 00:53

    Actually, its the non-bembas like Bisas, lungus and those from Luapula who have ruined the reputation of the Bemba language.

    Otherwise most real Bembas have good values. Non-bembas especially those from Luapula and the Bisas seem to have an inferiority attitude towards their languages, and have instead adopted Bemba. What a shame!

  21. gkc  May 12, 2013 at 22:01

    Traditions must be respected nd recognised by all , even during the rein of our ssviour christ, kings wete there nd respected nd well recognised by all age,s learn to know young stupid chaps thats y u ar dumed

  22. Mr Facts  May 12, 2013 at 20:26

    Commander in chief of the corrupt forces.

  23. Umuto walupwa tawitika  May 12, 2013 at 20:25

    Mpezeni should advise his friend correctly.

  24. chimuz  May 12, 2013 at 20:12

    Just a caution from the so called Nkandu.we know the confusion that has been on the throne of chief Chibesakunda which was caused by Nkandu and her relatives and at one time there were
    two chiefs claiming to be. That confusion went on for some many years until the rightful man a Mr.kakungu died. Now BA nkandu please that confusion you caused in chibesakunda shouldn’t be brought in Bembaland because you are you starting fire which you will fail to quench.Chibesakunda becoming Chitimukulu! How? Chibesakunda is not bemba and why should he become chitimukulu?

  25. Sylvia Chanyerekeza masebo  May 12, 2013 at 19:29

    Stupid Bembas with their dead chitimukulu

    • Mumba  May 12, 2013 at 20:11

      noko ichinyo

    • Compos Mentis  May 13, 2013 at 01:57

      Mukwai fwe bena lubemba teti tukwasuke naku kwasuka.

      Napwa,

      Nine mwina lubemba.

    • Boogie  May 13, 2013 at 13:24

      Ba noko chimpapila. Ulekwata umuchinshi.

  26. funky chicken  May 12, 2013 at 18:34

    OK, this is really a piss poor decision and action.

    Someone needs to inform the man that he is human, not God!

  27. ZOLO  May 12, 2013 at 18:15

    You Bemba Baaanfooons used to say it was the Lundas and and the Lubales who used to fight. Today its you. Shame!!

  28. ZOLO  May 12, 2013 at 18:14

    You Bemba Baanfoons used to say it was the Lundas and and the Lubales who used to fight. Today its you. Shame!!!

    • Hamwiine  May 12, 2013 at 19:26

      Uli mwa sana iwe

    • Mumba  May 12, 2013 at 20:11

      satamunyoko

  29. ZOLO  May 12, 2013 at 18:13

    You Bemba Baanfoons used to say it was the Lundas and and the Lubales who used to fight. Today its you. Shame!!

    • Hamwiine  May 12, 2013 at 19:27

      We mbwa we, kapoli

    • Compos Mentis  May 13, 2013 at 01:59

      First, your intended insult is lost on us completely. We don’t know what “Baanfoons” are, educated and cultured as we are.

      Move aside, ignoramus.

  30. virgin  May 12, 2013 at 17:33

    Wonama at one time complained that state house ground has turned brown didn’t he realize that throwing urine bags anyhow was the main cause?

  31. jef  May 12, 2013 at 17:21

    Chiefs now should know that by accepting to be part of the GRZ ministry of chiefs affairs and to be on pay-role means Mr Sata has total control and soon if not now he is the appointing authority of chiefs,our chiefs like eating no Wonder why they should always pay their allegiance to the head of state.Wait 2016 these chiefs will be pure vuvuzelas and any one with negative opinion will be dethroned without delay.

  32. Kay  May 12, 2013 at 17:10

    Silly Bembas, they thought they will get favours when they voted in a Bisa who pretended to be bemba. You MUST now accept a Bisa Chitimukulu, donchi kubeba!

  33. The Judge  May 12, 2013 at 17:00

    @ Foloko you surely have made my day!

  34. nyambe  May 12, 2013 at 16:48

    The issue is whether a non Bemba (a Bisa to be specific) become a Chitmukulu? The answer is a big NO!

  35. litiya kayula  May 12, 2013 at 16:30

    Sata and his Power Failure(PF) want manipulate all institutions:Judicially,Parliament,Chiefdoms,Police,ACC,DEC,etc.Please God come thru for us as a Nation,Zambia.

  36. mumba mumba  May 12, 2013 at 15:38

    Last time I made comments on this blog,regarding the upgrading, renaming and re-apportioning of some Provinces, I was insulted and called a teacher, all because I wanted to share the little knowledge I have with concerned bloggers. Yet this (lack of free expression) is what we are against in Zambia. Let me share this with fellow bloggers who care to listen. I am grandson to Chief Makasa of the Bemba, who is traditionally though not in reality supposed to be the first born son to Chitimukulu, this dates back to Kalulu -wa- Mbala in the days the Ngonis were rampaging through Bembaland. I also have the priviledge of having sat in Ilamfya meetings with my grandfather during the days of his ‘father’ Late Lakement Ng’andu.
    Noone amongst the Ilamfya, has more powers regarding the father’s crown than that yielded by Chief Makasa. Noone also has more say in terms of succession than that yielded by Makasa. So personally I tend to discredit the source of this story. Assuming that it is true then Chief Makasa will veto it.

  37. Posapo  May 12, 2013 at 15:37

    Mr Sata must leave the traditional leaders handle their succession matters.Government interference in succession wrangles is unproductive.

  38. Joe Johnson  May 12, 2013 at 15:25

    What’s the job of chiefs apart from causing disunity?

  39. Mambwe  May 12, 2013 at 15:21

    Sata’s lack of traditional norms in Zambia stems from his genetic origin. Sata is genetically a Tanzanian Mwakyusa whose father came to Northern Rhodesia as immigrant labourer and settled in Mpika. In Tanzania traditional Chiefs do not exist.

    By virtue of his parents settling in Mpika up to as 23rd October 1964, both Sata and Guy Scott technically qualify as a Zambian citizens. But Sata has embedded himself among the Bisa people. In his confusion, he calls himself a Bemba.

    Zambians know that Bembas and Bisas are two DIFFRENT ethnic groups. Bembaland is entrenched in parts of central and eastern Kasama crossing over Chambeshi at Mbesuma to include the western half of Chinsali. The people in Chishimba Falls area just west of Kasama and the entire Mporokoso District are not Bembas but the Lungus.

    The Bisas had occupied the entire Mpika District and parts of Chinsali where Chief Chibesakunda is located long before the Bembas arrived in this part of Zambia. A group of Bisa led by Kambwili, also migrated to settle on the eastern banks of the Luangwa River (in areas of mu-Chibande, kwa Munkasanga, kwa Mansumba and kwa Yakobe and Chiwala) and these still recognise Chief Kopa as their traditional head..

    The Bembas have established a very strong ordely system of recognising as to who should take up the throne of Paramount Chief Chitimukulu among the genetically ethnically recognised Bemba Royal Clans entrenched north of the Chambeshi River. On the other hand the Bisa Royal Clans belong to the Bena-Ng’ona; the Bisa Chiefs, including Chibesakunda, Chikwanda, Luchembe, Mukungule etc have accepted Senior Chief Kopa as the traditional Head of the Bisa south of Chambeshi River.

    Vice President Guy Scott and Justice Lombe Chibesakunda must strongly advise Sata NEVER to meddle into the manner the Bemba Chiefs recognise their Paramount Chief Chitimulu.

    The younger generation must appreciate this historical background.

    If Sata is allowed to push his political WILL against the Bemba Royal Establishment, this President will sow seeds of anarchy and bring about untold serious conflicts between the Bembas and Bisas. In this regard, History is vital.

  40. Chalon'chamano  May 12, 2013 at 15:18

    Ladies and gentelemen of the ballot, beware! Traditional structures comprise the fabric of Zambia. Unity peace and development depend on sustaining this age-old social arrangement. I see too much meddling in traditional affairs, or am I getting senile, blind and dull?

  41. foloko  May 12, 2013 at 15:18

    Beware of power, it corrupts absolutely. If I were PF, I would maintain the status quo and avoid any attempt to become an absolute majority in Parliament or muscle my way in other spheres of governance just yet, but wait for the next election. Unfortunately FJT and Levy (MTSRIP) are not around to give advice, ba RB busy in court and they will not listen to him anyway even if he gave wise counsel; ba KK who could offer advice ni ba kwalola umwela. In one way or another we have eliminated all our rich sources of presidential advice and deliberately chosen to be an orphan country. For some reason, we are too much in a hurry to wait for 2016 aren’t we? And therein lies the grave that we are digging for ourselves, so deep that even Ghosts will not be able to come out of it.

    • McDonnell Douglas DC 10 - 30 wide body (Nkhwazi)  May 12, 2013 at 21:23

      Very good analysis.

  42. Vilifier  May 12, 2013 at 14:58

    Its funny how our president with an overflowing in-tray finds time to poke his nose in the affairs of parastatals, chiefdoms and demeaning of all Nevers hair-cut programme.

  43. peter  May 12, 2013 at 14:27

    I agree we don’t need chiefs. They are wizards

    • dumbo  May 12, 2013 at 14:40

      Even before we were colonized we had chiefs,it’s part of our culture please try not to be a cocunut(black outside but white inside).

      • Puungwa  May 12, 2013 at 19:14

        Tonga people never had chiefs only rainmakers or priests of malende.

    • Bolt  May 12, 2013 at 17:22

      Cheese boy thinking!

  44. litiya kayula  May 12, 2013 at 14:24

    This confirms that NO Bemba has really ruled Zambia as President.Kaunda’s origin is Malawi,Chiluba-DRC,Sata is Bisa from Mpika,hence the desire to impose his tribesman,a Bisa as Chitimukulu.It won’t work.

    • Jacob Zume  May 12, 2013 at 18:05

      No Bemba has indeed ruled Zambia only thieves. The only thing is thieves is synonymus with Bembas

      • Hamwiine  May 12, 2013 at 19:30

        Uli cifi ca ng’ombe iwe

  45. trader  May 12, 2013 at 14:01

    These Bisas really must f off and stop trying to impose themselves on a clearly defined succession path. Theyve done enough to ruin the bemba name as people believe they are bembas! I hope people will now see the difference through this latest drama

    • Blago  May 13, 2013 at 01:07

      You are spot on my brother. I am not Bemba, and I have a number of real bemba friends who are very good values. Its the non-bembas like Bisaa, those from Luapula etc who tend to have an inferiority attitude towards their languages who have ruined the reputation of the Bemba tribe.

  46. Jane  May 12, 2013 at 13:57

    This is a big plot, have seen jimmy fingers hosting bob Luo at Chita lodge and he has already started addressing him as ba chitimukulu

  47. rasta  May 12, 2013 at 13:46

    good move mr. sata.when we told bembas that sata is a dictator they thought we were fools,show them sata boì!!!

  48. Mpongo Muleya  May 12, 2013 at 13:40

    A dictator is always a dictator and will wish to have his way on all matters.

  49. Mr Facts  May 12, 2013 at 13:29

    Mr pres please don’t involve yourself in chiefs affairs ,especially the appointing of chitimuku ,these are big issues. This is not like poaching Mps from MMD

    • Compos Mentis  May 13, 2013 at 02:22

      Agree with you.

      (*sings song mu cibemba*)

      “Mwebena lubemba eee
      seni mutambe!
      Mwebena lubemba eee
      seni mutambe!
      Umutomboko umutomboko
      emasha ya kumwesu….”

      If I could speak jhi tonga I would sing a tonga song as well.Same for Luvale, Lozi, Nsenga, lamba etc.

      Don’t bring the ugly dog-eat-dog world of politics to our chiefdoms. Let’s keep a little of ourselves sacrosanct, shall we?

  50. Ba robby  May 12, 2013 at 13:27

    Why can’t we just do away with this nonsense of chiefs. go to tanzania and kenya there is no this bullshit despite tribes there having traditional values

    • Zyukuwalola  May 12, 2013 at 13:37

      Any idea that you may have should be produced or introduced using pallatable language. Try again son/daughter. Chiza uli?

    • Simangulungwa  May 12, 2013 at 14:25

      That is why there are always tribals fights there, hacking each other with machetes, burning villages and killing each other’s animals.

      Why do you think their way of life is better than ours?

      • Uniqueo  May 12, 2013 at 14:49

        @Simangulungwa, come on, now. Why are there no tribal fights in Chimwemwe, Sunningdale, Matero and Kanyama, for instance?

      • teacher  May 12, 2013 at 15:18

        Wa mulasa chikala uyu. He thinks visiting Tanganyika and kikuyuland and copying what they do without thinking is wisdom to share. Ignorant chap.

        • Ba robby  May 13, 2013 at 03:37

          Panyo pa bamayi bako chikkala pombuwa

      • Uniqueo  May 12, 2013 at 15:18

        @Simangulungwa & @dumbo, see a news item on this site “Nkoya chief threatens government”. Although I’ve no time for PF government, I think this is one of the indicators that chiefs don’t think outside the box. Hence, this institution is not suited to deal with exigencies of modern life. Looking at the backwardness of villages and the treating of “their subjects” as serfs are serious indictments on the platform of human rights.

      • tonto fever  May 12, 2013 at 19:15

        eeh! No wonder there was too much lenshina (regina) uprisings. These bisas are a problem. Any way we apologise to our bemba brothers for misrepresenting you in any form. All along it has been a bisa (monkey) in the green maize field. Kikikikikikikikkkkkkkk

    • Uniqueo  May 12, 2013 at 14:42

      @Ba robby, you’re right on! These relics are completely irrelevant in this day and age. They need to be relayed to museums ‘like yesterday’.

    • Twabwela  May 12, 2013 at 16:23

      I agree with you Mudala – I really dont see the need for Chiefs. Absolute share waste of time and emotional resources.

    • Compos Mentis  May 13, 2013 at 02:11

      We can’t do away with it because it is OUR cultural heritage. You think we should give it up in favour of the western system of government? We have to play on the world stage and thus have no option but to adopt the western system of government, but why the hell should we give up our cultural identity completely?

      I actually think we’d fare better!!!

      • Ba robby  May 13, 2013 at 03:40

        The reason why we should do away with the is because they have lost there relevance.don’t you see that now they have become political objects?are at peace with the behaviour of our chiefs.they must piss off.

        • Compos Mentis  May 13, 2013 at 05:16

          that would be equivalent to throwing the baby away with the bath water!

          Because the politicians are using them as pawns in their power games, we get rid of the chiefs? The politicians should desist from their interference instead!

          Even if they are more figureheads than anything, we have to strive to keep our languages, customs etc…it’s our heritage

Comments are closed.