The original sin; did the serpent had sex with Eve before Adam did?

By Richard Zulu

— “I will put enmity between thy seed and her Seed” (Genesis 3:15) —

Genesis 4:1 and 2 begins, “and Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain and said, I have gotten a man from the Lord. And she again bare his brother Abel. . .” Herein, we see Eve’s great deception at the birth of her first son. Still believing the Serpent’s lie, she actually thought Cain was the beginning of the creation of God, the Savior of mankind. However God acknowledged no direct relationship with Cain and he is from birth an outcast.

His name was to become synonymous with treachery and murder. The next mention of Cain is on this Wise: “But unto Cain and to his offering He had not respect” (Genesis 4:5). Not only was Cain’s offering refused, but Cain was himself forbidden an approach that his brother Abel enjoyed. Why was Cain rejected? Also in relation to this—what was the fruit Adam and Eve partook? What role did the serpent play in the fall? What was the serpent seed of Genesis 3:15?

The answer to this mysterious riddle has remained hidden for centuries. Under this prophet’s ministry, God has provided the solution:

“Now in the Garden of Eden there were two trees standing in the midst of it. One was the Tree of Life, the other was the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. Man was to live by the Tree of Life; but he was not to touch the other tree or he would die. But man did partake of the other tree, and when he did, death entered into him by his sin, and he became separated from God.

Some have an idea that the two trees in the garden were just two more trees like unto the rest of those that God had placed there. But careful students know that this is not so. When John the Baptist cried that the ax was laid to the root of all trees, he was not talking of simply natural trees, but of spiritual principles. Now in I John 5:11 it says, “And this is the RECORD, that God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in His son.” Jesus said in John 5:40, “And ye will not come to Me, that ye might have life.” Thus the record, God’s Word, states plainly and clearly that LIFE, ETERNAL LIFE, is in the Son. It is no other place. I John 5:12, “He that hath the Son hath LIFE: and he that hath not the Son of God hath NOT Life.” Now since the record cannot change, be taken from or added thereunto, then the record stands that THE LIFE IS IN THE SON . . . Since this is so. THE TREE IN THE GARDEN HAS TO BE JESUS.

Alright. If the Tree of Life is a person, then the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil is a person ALSO. It can’t be otherwise. Thus the Righteous One and the Wicked One stood side by side there in the midst of the Garden of Eden. Ezekiel 28:13a “Thou (Satan) hast been in Eden, the garden of God”.

Here is where we receive the true revelation of the “serpent’s seed.” Here is what really happened in the Garden of Eden. The Word says that Eve was beguiled by the serpent. She was actually seduced by the serpent. It says in Genesis 3:1, “Now the serpent was more subtle than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made.” This beast was so close to a human being (and yet was pure animal) that he could reason and talk. He was an upright creature and was somewhere in between a chimpanzee and a man, but closer to a man. He was so close to being a human that his seed could, and did mingle with that of the woman and cause her to conceive. When this happened, God cursed the serpent. He changed every bone in the serpent’s body so that he had to crawl like a snake. Science can try all it wants to, and it won’t find the missing link. God saw to that. Man is smart and he can see an association of man with animal and he tries to prove it out of evolution. There isn’t any evolution. But man and animal did mingle. That’s one of the mysteries of God that has remained hidden, but here it is revealed. It happened right back there in the midst of Eden when Eve turned away from Life to accept Death.

Notice what God said to them in the garden. Genesis 3:15, “And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed, and it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.” If we give credit to the Word that the woman did have a seed then the serpent must have surely had a seed also. If the seed of the woman was a man-child apart from the man, then the seed of the serpent will have to be in the same pattern, and that is, another male must he born apart from human male instrumentality. There is no student who does not know the seed of the woman was the Christ Who came by the instrumentality of God, apart from human intercourse. It is also just as well known that the predicted bruising of the serpent’s head was in actuality a prophecy concerning what Christ would accomplish against Satan at the cross. There at the cross, Christ would bruise the head of Satan while Satan would bruise the heel of the Lord.

This portion of Scripture is the revelation of how the literal seed of the serpent was sown in the earth, even as we have the account of Luke 1:26-35, wherein is set forth the exact account of how the seed of the woman came unto physical manifestation apart from the instrumentality of the human male. “And in the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent from God unto a city of Galilee, named Nazareth, to a virgin espoused to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David, and the virgin’s name was Mary. And the angel came in unto her, and said, ‘Hail thou that art highly favoured, the Lord is with thee; blessed art thou among women.’ And when she saw him, she was troubled at his saying, and cast in her mind what manner of salutation this should be. And the angel said unto her, ‘Fear not, Mary; for thou hast found favour with God. And, behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb and bring forth a Son, and shalt call His Name Jesus. He shall be great and shall be called the Son of the Highest; and the Lord God shall give unto Him the Throne of His father David: And He shall reign over the house of Jacob for ever: and of His kingdom there shall be no end. Then said Mary unto the angel, ‘How shall this be, seeing I know not a man?’ And the angel answered and said unto her, ‘The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee; therefore also That Holy Thing Which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God’.”

As the seed of the woman was literally God reproducing Himself in human flesh, so the seed of the serpent is the literal way that Satan found he was able to open the door to himself into the human race. It was impossible for Satan (for he is only a CREATED spirit-being) to reproduce himself in the manner which God reproduced Himself, so the Genesis account tells how he produced his seed and introduced or injected himself into the human race. Also recall that Satan is called the “serpent.” It is his seed or injection into the human race we are speaking of.

Before Adam ever had carnal knowledge of Eve, the serpent had that knowledge ahead of him. And that one born of it was Cain. Cain was of (born of, begotten of) “that Wicked One” (I John 3:12). The Holy Spirit in John could not in one place call Adam the “Wicked One” (for that is what he would be if he fathered Cain) and in another place call Adam the “Son of God” which he was by creation (Luke 3:38). Cain turned out in character like his father, a bringer of death, a murderer. His utter defiance of God when faced by the Almighty in Genesis 4:5, 13-14, show him to be absolutely unhuman-like in characteristics, seeming even to surpass any account we have in Scripture concerning a confrontation of Satan with God. “But unto Cain and to his offering he had not respect. And Cain was very wroth, and his countenance fell. And the Lord said unto Cain, ‘Where is Abel thy brother?’ And he said, ‘I know not; Am I my brother’s keeper?’ And Cain said unto the Lord, ‘My punishment is greater than I can bear. Behold, Thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth: and from Thy face shall I be hid: and I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond in the earth; and it shall come to pass, that every one that findeth me shall slay me’.”

Notice the exact way the record of God sets forth the account of the births of Cain, Abel and Seth. Genesis 4:1, “And Adam knew Eve his wife, and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, ‘I have gotten a man from the Lord.’ And she again bare his brother Abel.” Genesis 4:25, “And Adam knew his wife again and she bare a son, and called his name Seth…” There are THREE sons born from TWO acts of carnal knowledge by Adam. Since the Bible is the exact and perfect Word of God, this is no mistake but a record for our illumination. Since THREE sons were born from TWO acts by Adam, you know POSITIVELY that ONE of those WAS NOT the son of Adam. God has recorded this in this exact manner to show us something. The truth of the matter is that Eve had in her womb TWO sons (twins from SEPARATE impregnations). She was carrying twins, with Cain’s conception sometime previous to that of Abel’s.

TWINS again. Perfect type as always. To those who think that this is not possible, let it be known that the medical records are replete with cases where women have carried twins who were of separate ova and separate insemination with the fertilization of the eggs being days apart, and NOT ONLY SO, but some of the records show that the twins were fathered by separate males. Recently worldwide coverage was given to a Norwegian mother who was suing her husband for support for herself and her twins, one of which was white and the other black. She admitted that she had a Negro lover. The two conceptions were about three weeks apart. In Beaumont, Texas, in 1963, the records again set forth a multiple birth wherein pregnancies were many days apart, in fact so much so the woman almost died along with one child in childbirth (ibid. p. 97-100).

The pagan origins of Easter
Using Zambian Stars, TP Mazembe thrash Power Dynamos 6-0

84 Responses to "The original sin; did the serpent had sex with Eve before Adam did?"

  1. mwanza wilson  April 7, 2012 at 22:52

    GOD BLES BR. ZULU YOU ARE RIGHT

  2. TB JOSHUA A FALSE PROPHET  April 7, 2012 at 22:14

    Ruchard Zulu,you are genious devil who does’t deserve to live in this world.The meaning of word water in genesis is not the same meaning in revalation.Your kind is called [THE NEW AGE] first degree in satanism

  3. Nkisu  April 7, 2012 at 21:37

    Mr. Richard Zule. What Prophet’s ministry? You are a prophet? All what you have here is not your work, but something you have picked on the internet. This is someone’s work not yours.

  4. Spot on  April 7, 2012 at 21:29

    Ba Zulu,fools explain scriptures to their own destruction.Your article is full of your own contradictions…If there was any atom of truth in your spiritualy flawed and scientificaly bogus claim,then you must be Cain’s descendant or the devil’s great grandson. So you tell me that Adam also slept with satan since Eve gave the fruit to him.

  5. Realistic Atheist  April 7, 2012 at 20:59

    BOTH THE OLD AND THE NEW TESTAMENT CONTAIN INDISPUTABLE EVIDENCE THAT GOD CONDONED AND STILL DOES SUPPORT SLAVERY, WHICH IS TODAY AN ABOMINATION BANNED BY OUR CIVILIZED WORLD, IN DEFIANCE AGAINST THE IMMUTABLE GOD, WHO ALLOWED IT. IS THIS GOD WHO CONDONES SLAVERY SUPPOSED TO BE WORSHIPPED? NOT BY ANY RATIONAL MODERN MAN!

  6. Seed Inspector  April 7, 2012 at 20:57

    This is total madness! Why did I even read this article?

  7. Jewish Sage  April 7, 2012 at 20:55

    BOTH THE OLD AND THE NEW TESTAMENT CONTAIN INDISPUTABLE EVIDENCE THAT GOD CONDONED AND STILL DOES SUPPORT SLAVERY, WHICH IS TODAY AN ABOMINATION BANNED BY OUR CIVILIZED WORLD, IN DEFIANCE AGAINST THE IMMUTABLE GOD, WHO ALLOWED IT. IS THIS GOD WHO CONDONES SLAVERY SUPPOSED TO BE WORSHIPPED? NOT BY ANY RATIONAL MODERN MAN!

  8. diabro  April 7, 2012 at 20:15

    Let us not put God 2 test, if u who ever wrote this from the begining is a satanist, keep it 2 yoself, grow up.

  9. Aiz  April 7, 2012 at 19:59

    No 1 knows the absolut truth about the bible. After all, yr minds av been colonised by it and u av taken yr own religions to be evil. Hypocrits! The Bible?

  10. TM Beebe  April 7, 2012 at 19:17

    Ba author, where have you got these wild but diabolic imaginations? God have mercy on you as you have opened up your soul to lying spirits

  11. Isaac  April 7, 2012 at 19:11

    I do not like commenting,but I will not be silent and let Zulu put the name of God in reproach. 2 Th 2:9-12,Z ulu read the text I hav given you and pray for understanding. Do not mislead masses. The tree of knowledge and life will still be there in the restored eden. How can you refer Jesus as a tree. You are the enemy of God who hates truth. Repent and keep such comments to yourself.

  12. Realistic Atheist  April 7, 2012 at 19:09

    THIS ARTICLE IS NOTHING BUT A STUPID FAIRY TALE, BASED ON RELIGIOUS BULLSHIT!

  13. joeking  April 7, 2012 at 19:04

    the only sensible thing i have noted is the gramatic error on the headline.

  14. Msengezi Mtapila  April 7, 2012 at 18:48

    Cain in this ephasised the theory of election.God choose those who will go to heaven before hand.Before you are born you are either chosen or rejected by God.There is nothing you can do like Cain.Its not about what you can do to get to heaven its about what God has done.Read Romans 9 the whole chapter.Pastors have failed to teach this truth.

  15. Msengezi Mtapila  April 7, 2012 at 18:39

    Cain in this ephasised the theory of election.God choose those who will go to heaven before hand.Before you are born you are either chosen or rejected by God.There is nothing you can do like Cain.Nathing

  16. Msengezi Mtapila  April 7, 2012 at 18:29

    Cain in this ephasised the theory of election.God choice

  17. jmnan  April 7, 2012 at 18:22

    for those who say that the bible says what it means and means what it says literally, how do you interpret the scripture says that if someone slaps on the other cheek give him the other, and when jesus says eat my blood and drink my flesh does he put it up literally. dont be foolish and naive. the bible has a lot of truth hidden to natural carnal eye.

  18. Fly on the Wall  April 7, 2012 at 17:13

    Word is out that Ukwa has sneaked out to India for medical attention again!! Some one verify please.

  19. Grief chisenga  April 7, 2012 at 17:04

    The thing mentioned is the fruit but not sex.Read Genesis 1:28,God told them 2 have children.Dont be lyk pipo mentioned on Mathew 24:24.

  20. MUNYELO PWETE!  April 7, 2012 at 16:38

    @ RICHARD ZULU

    BA MBUYA NAIMWE NICHANI? YOU SOUND AS IF YOU ARE POSSESED WITH CHITIMUKULU SPIRIT!

  21. Kapyanga  April 7, 2012 at 16:27

    Take it or leave it Its from the devine principle. how abt it?

  22. Kapyanga  April 7, 2012 at 16:22

    Its from the devine principle. how abt it?

  23. The Gambino  April 7, 2012 at 16:21

    Madness, confused, fantasy, nonsense, ubushilu,

  24. cs  April 7, 2012 at 15:33

    The problem with Zulu is that he wants the Bible to mean what he thinks. There are no mysteries in the Bible. What God wrote is what he meant full stop.

  25. The Real People  April 7, 2012 at 15:04

    GOD FORGIVE THE AUTHOR OF THIS ARTICLE AND MAY YOU PLEASE REMOVE THIS BRASPHEMY FROM OUR COUNTRY

  26. Abracadabra 90 days more money in your pocket  April 7, 2012 at 14:20

    Who cares about myths written by some people in the Middle East thousands of years ago?

  27. Seethat  April 7, 2012 at 14:20

    THE article is FLAWED.The Catholics are responsible for this mess! They wrongly teach that Adam and Eve sinned by having sex. The Catholics also accept Evolution on the origin of life. The less vigilant ones like the Author of this article have been influenced by such teachings tapped from Catholics and the theory of evolution.As such this article fails to explain Genesis 3:22-23: God deported Adam and Eve from the garden of eden so that they don’t it from the tree again. So there was such a TREE!

  28. Drewman  April 7, 2012 at 14:10

    What a moron! Your english is pathetic and your reasoning( if any) is straight from the rectum.

  29. Mosaad  April 7, 2012 at 14:08

    Ala mwalapena nomba.Beware these are the last days.God have mercy upon the author

  30. kambwili mwana kopala  April 7, 2012 at 13:59

    crazy artical.. remember all, wen God says dont we shouldnt. adam n eva did wat God said shouldnt. it doest matter wat fruit was eaten. ISAIAH 55vs8:11(for MY thoughts are not YOUR THOUGHTS NOR ARE YOUR WAYS MY WAYS SAYS THE LORD. 9. FOR AS THE HEAVENS ARE HIGHER THAN THE EARTH, SO ARE MY WAYS HIGHER THAN YOUR WAYS AND MY THOUGHTS THAN YOUR THOUGHTS) mr zulu you cant out think God.

  31. Pa Bwato  April 7, 2012 at 13:47

    Somebody on WD once typed ‘Do not put a question mark where God has put a period.’ wanva Zulu

  32. surprised!!!  April 7, 2012 at 13:45

    Why should mysteries be explained with other mysteries? Sin is made to look so simple? And what is the moral lesson here? We are all proud to live, but ashamed to realise that we are direct products of humanity sexual intercourse and his and her reproductive organs. God has hidden issues from our understanding, but we insist we must discover HIS intentions. GOD has instructed us to observe the Ten Commandments. We don’t do what we can do but instead head off in search of mysteries.

  33. The psychiatrist  April 7, 2012 at 13:41

    The scripture was written from a human perspective, like God lived there and would even like patrol the gardens and even find Adam hiding in the bushes and even ask him as to his whereabouts. We have been so brainwashed that to question the correctness of any these stories in the so called word of God could spell dealth. For example the book of Exodus is said to have been written by Moses ironically it ends with any account of how he died. Is it not logical to assume that someone else inserted that account to complete the story.who cud it have been. After all the word was meant for a choosen people, typical of the isms of tribalism that have dogged us into unending conflict.Why should we believe this book so much as to abandon our own original beliefs.Remember the knowledge of the Bible is barely some 200 years old in this part of the world but we have been in existence for thousands of years.Zulu pls bring more of such stories they make more sense in this scientific age.

  34. Ziliko  April 7, 2012 at 13:30

    THIS IS MORE THAN HERESY!!!

  35. Milan Sichinga  April 7, 2012 at 13:26

    Brave!!! I like that..

  36. Milan Sichinga  April 7, 2012 at 13:25

    Brave!! I like that…

  37. Jinks  April 7, 2012 at 13:20

    Yes a serpent is 1 very cuning animal frm inception of mankind. jst lyk our king cobra, he snikd hs way into presidency by deception dats y he sims cursed by God

  38. Wantanshi  April 7, 2012 at 13:12

    A perfectly satanic teaching. Amazing how false preachers complicate and twist clear scripture. Cain a son of Satan!? This false preacher makes this assertion after correctly quoting the Bible which says Cain was conceived after Even had intercourse with Adam.

  39. BAROTSE ACTIVIST  April 7, 2012 at 13:05

    Zulu is confused lol hahaha… what a silly article by a dumb ass monkey lol

  40. Tumelo  April 7, 2012 at 13:03

    Blasphemy, lucky you are in Zambia. If you write like that in an Islamic country you will be dead by now.

  41. Ruphia Bwezani Banda  April 7, 2012 at 12:59

    Blasphamy!!in the olden age we would have stoned you to death.Zeal without knowledge.God forgive you.

  42. sonboy  April 7, 2012 at 12:52

    total madness

  43. Theologian  April 7, 2012 at 12:48

    Mr. Richard Zulu, your article is wrong and full of imaginations. First of all, the story of creation and the fall of the first couple is a mythical story and a myth tries to explain a truth using symbolisms. It is well known that the story of the serpent tried to explain the origin of evil and is not necessarily about a being you call was animal almost like man. Secondly, it is very clear in Genesis that after God formed man and woman, he called on them to multiply and fill the earth so the sexual act is not the sin of eating from the tree of good and bad. Thirdly, you say the animal that later became a serpent was not a human being but still had carnal knowledge of Eve. That is a lie my dear because scientifically, an animal cannot have a child with a human being. Go back to biology and everything will be explained to you. I CAUTION YOU, MR BANDA, TO KEEP YOUR IMAGINATIONS TO YOURSELF. SCRIPTURE IS A SACRED WORD OF GOD AND IS NOT MEANT FOR FANTASY PLEASE!!!!

  44. Former zambian.  April 7, 2012 at 12:46

    U must b mad 4 u think like that, join yo bros/sistez in chainama, they wil b glad 2 c u.

  45. mweemba A  April 7, 2012 at 12:46

    Devils article

  46. Original Zambian  April 7, 2012 at 12:43

    Mr Zulu, you seem to contradict yourself and make many unsubstantiative assumptions. A question for you ‘Is Genesis 4v1 false?

  47. chola jhb  April 7, 2012 at 12:43

    False Teachings …dont listen to this ….its lies

  48. rate of reaction  April 7, 2012 at 12:43

    ok i think my head is spinning now. No wonder i choose not religion, each has so many theories. My only religion for now is what i think is appropriate. Though i believe in God.

  49. Matako  April 7, 2012 at 12:33

    Zulu do not show your ignorance to the world by misquoting scripture. It is clear from scripture that Cain was born after Adam had sex with Eve. THe question of does not suffice. Go back and reread your scriptures

  50. good girl gone bad  April 7, 2012 at 12:32

    Ok so whats your point?

Comments are closed.